The Islamic claim of Muhammad in Bhavishya Purana has sparked great controversy. While Islamic preachers like Dr. Zakir Naik claim Prophet Muhammad in Bhavishya Purana and produce a translation of the Purana hailing the Prophet as a holy teacher who arrived to cleanse all evils, the Hindu scholars produce just the opposite interpretation of the same. How is this possible? Who is lying? Is Zakir Nayik trying conveniently bend the Purana to his advantage by biased and non existent translation or are the Hindu Scholars hiding the real truth? Is Zakir preaching a different purana known as "Islamic Purana" or the Hindu Scholars manipulating the real truth? Let us evaluate.
First let us see the Script in question.
First let us see the Script in question.
Let me split them for better view
No comments:
Post a Comment